Why Cindy Sheehan needs to shut up (or at least get on point)
And then when the speaker from Alliance to End the Israeli Occupation spoke, I seriously thought we had gone off the tracks.
And today I found myself actually agreeing with a column by Charles Krauthammer, who normally I find to be a pompous asshole.
Bad Choice for an Antiwar Voice
By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, September 30, 2005; Page A19
A large number of Americans feel deep and understandable unease about the war in Iraq and want nothing more than to pull out. But the antiwar movement is singularly disserved by its leadership, such as it is. Its de facto leader is Cindy Sheehan...
[...]
The antiwar movement has found itself ill served by endowing absolute moral authority on a political radical who demanded that American troops leave not just Iraq but "occupied New Orleans." Who blames Israel for her son's death. Who complained that the news media went "100 percent rita" -- "a little wind and a little rain" -- rather than covering other things in the world, meaning her.
Most tellingly, Sheehan demands withdrawal not just from Iraq but also from Afghanistan, a war that is not only just by every possible measure but also remarkably successful.
Okay, it's absurd to call the Afghanistan War "remarkably successful" but it was at least a worthwhile war, one that most of the reasonable left supported, and one that probably demands more resources to finish the job, not pullout.
You don't build a mass movement on that. Nor on antiwar rallies like the one last weekend in Washington, organized and run by a front group for the Workers World Party. The WWP is descended from Cold War Stalinists who found other communists insufficiently rigorous for refusing to support the Soviet invasion of Hungary. Thus a rally ostensibly against war is run by a group that supported the Soviet invasions of Hungary, Czechoslovakia and Afghanistan, the massacre in Tiananmen Square, and a litany of the very worst mass murderers of our time, including Slobodan Milosevic, Hussein and Kim Jong Il. You don't seize the moral high ground in America with fellow travelers such as these.
Can we get the fuck rid of ANSWER too while we're at it? Though I tend to agree with most of their stuff, they're a terrible figurehead for the anti-war movement, considering 99% of the anti-war public probably has major disagreements with ANSWER's positions on non-Iraq issues.